2026-08-28·by Sijie Wang#node

models

Communication models & formulas — the map

Parent: communication. The delivery-craft notes sit ON TOP of this layer; this is the science substrate. Each item below is its own atomic note (one formula / one model = one note). This parent carries only the organizing view; the substance lives in the children.

The three through-lines (why the field is shaped this way)

  1. The whole history is people adding back what Shannon deliberately stripped. 1948's engineering skeleton (source→channel→receiver, "meaning is irrelevant to the engineering problem") had no meaning, no context, no active audience, no power. Every later model re-inserts one piece Shannon dropped: Schramm adds the shared field of experience + feedback; Hall adds the audience that re-makes meaning; the propaganda model adds power. The real math lives only at Shannon's layer (§2); the rest are lenses, not equations.
  2. The pendulum on media power never settled — ELM is its verdict. Powerful (hypodermic needle) → limited (two-step flow, the active selecting audience) → powerful-but-subtle (agenda-setting, cultivation, framing: media set not what you think but what about and what feels normal). The unresolved knot — is the audience a chooser or a vessel? — is answered by involvement: high → central route, low → peripheral. ELM adjudicates the whole quarrel.
  3. Only the diffusion/virality group has predictive teeth. Most theories explain after the fact; Bass (p + q), the viral coefficient K=i×c, and SIR's R₀ are the ones you can actually estimate and falsify.

The eight families (child notes; four now live in their home sciences and are linked, not owned — reclassified 2026-08-05)

§1 Transmission / process modelslasswell-5w · shannon-weaver-model · schramm-model · berlo-smcr · osgood-schramm-circular · westley-maclean · gerbner-model · newcomb-abx · dance-helix §2 Information theory (the actual math — lives at wiki/math/ information-theory)shannon-entropy · channel-capacity · mutual-information · redundancy · zipf-law · heaps-law §3 Effects & mass-communication theoriesagenda-setting · framing-theory · priming · cultivation-theory · spiral-of-silence · uses-and-gratifications · two-step-flow · knowledge-gap · third-person-effect · encoding-decoding · propaganda-model §4 Persuasion / attitude changeelm · heuristic-systematic-model · yale-attitude-change · inoculation · social-judgment-theory · narrative-transportation · cialdini-principles · monroe-motivated-sequence · compliance-tactics · borrowed from cognitive-science: cognitive-dissonance · reactance §5 Advertising / marketing response formulasaida · hierarchy-of-effects · dagmar · purchase-funnel · fcb-grid §6 Diffusion & viralitydiffusion-of-innovations · bass-diffusion-model (marketing-native, stay here); the growth math lives at wiki/math/ spreading-dynamics: viral-coefficient · sir-information-epidemic · network-scaling-laws · tipping-point-critical-mass §7 Memory & attention effects (lives at cognitive-science)serial-position · peak-end-rule · von-restorff-effect · mere-exposure · zeigarnik-effect · picture-superiority · processing-fluency §8 Linguistic–pragmatic layer (pragmatics lives at linguistics)grices-maxims · speech-act-theory · relevance-theory · semiotics · rhetoric

Coverage diagnosis (where to dig)

Already developed as their own notes: ELM/two-routes, three appeals, Cialdini/peripheral cues, inoculation, narrative transportation, semiotics, growth-stages (Rogers/Moore). Least column coverage, most transfer to agent-produced content: §3 mass-effects, §2 information-theory math, §6 diffusion equations, §7 memory effects. Paired reference: the communication-jargon-glossary.

about this entry

One of sijie's wiki entries. The AI on this site is grounded in the same corpus and answers in sijie's voice, with citations back to entries like this one — answering costs sijie money, so it waits behind a code: enter an access code →