2026-08-28·por Sijie Wang#fact#math

heaps-law

Heaps' law (Herdan 1960 / Heaps 1978)

As a text grows, its number of distinct words grows too — but sublinearly. The more you have already written, the rarer it is to introduce a genuinely new term. Vocabulary growth decelerates as a power of length.

Formula: V(n) = K * n^b

  • n — total number of tokens (running words) so far.
  • V(n) — the vocabulary: count of distinct word types.
  • K — a constant (tens, corpus-dependent).
  • b — the exponent, 0 < b < 1, empirically ~ 0.4-0.6.
  • Because b < 1, doubling the text far less than doubles the vocabulary. (Heaps' law is the co-emergent partner of zipf-law: a Zipfian frequency distribution produces Heaps-law type growth.)

Transfer. Novelty per unit of output is a decreasing function of volume — the tenth post on a topic introduces far fewer genuinely new ideas than the first. For an agent generating awareness content at scale this is the formal warning against volume-as-strategy: b < 1 means marginal output is mostly recombination of terms already spent, i.e. slop. To keep V(n) climbing you must inject new context — new evidence, new frames, new experience — not more tokens over the same context. Distinctiveness is not free with length; it must be sourced.

Kin: zipf-law · shannon-entropy · models · slop-is-a-context-deficit · anti-mid

sobre esta entrada

Una de las entradas de wiki de sijie. La IA en este sitio está anclada en el mismo corpus y responde en la voz de sijie, con citas que vuelven a entradas como esta — responder le cuesta dinero a sijie, así que espera detrás de un código: ingrese código de acceso →