2026-08-28·作者 Sijie Wang#math

arithmetic-dynamics

Arithmetic dynamics — finite orbits over number fields

Parent: orbit · Prereq: discrete-dynamical-systems

The number-theoretic branch (Silverman's school): iterate a rational map φ:P1→P1\varphi: \mathbb{P}^1 \to \mathbb{P}^1 of degree d≥2d \ge 2 defined over a number field KK (think: φ(z)=z2+c\varphi(z) = z^2 + c with c∈Qc \in \mathbb{Q}), and ask which rational points have small orbits.

Definition

A point xx is preperiodic if its orbit is finite (eventually periodic). Write Preper⁡(φ,K)\operatorname{Preper}(\varphi, K) for the preperiodic points with coordinates in KK.

The height machine

The tool that makes this number theory rather than dynamics: the Weil height h(x)h(x), measuring the arithmetic complexity of a rational point (h(pq)=log⁡max⁡(∣p∣,∣q∣)h(\tfrac{p}{q}) = \log\max(|p|, |q|) in lowest terms). Two facts:

  1. h(φ(x))=d⋅h(x)+O(1)h(\varphi(x)) = d \cdot h(x) + O(1) — applying φ\varphi multiplies complexity by the degree, up to bounded error.
  2. Northcott's theorem: only finitely many points of KK have height below any given bound.
Canonical height (Call–Silverman)

h^φ(x)=lim⁡n→∞h(φn(x))d n\hat{h}_\varphi(x) = \lim_{n \to \infty} \dfrac{h(\varphi^n(x))}{d^{\,n}} — the limit exists because fact 1 makes the sequence Cauchy (telescoping the O(1)O(1) errors gives ∣h^−h∣≤C|\hat{h} - h| \le C for a constant CC independent of xx). It repairs fact 1 into an exact identity: h^φ(φ(x))=d⋅h^φ(x)\hat{h}_\varphi(\varphi(x)) = d \cdot \hat{h}_\varphi(x).

Finite orbits = zero canonical height

h^φ(x)=0  ⟺  x\hat{h}_\varphi(x) = 0 \iff x is preperiodic. (⇐\Leftarrow: a finite orbit has bounded hh, so h(φnx)/dn→0h(\varphi^n x)/d^n \to 0. ⇒\Rightarrow: h^=0\hat{h} = 0 forces h(φnx)≤Ch(\varphi^n x) \le C for all nn, and Northcott makes the orbit finite.) Corollary: Preper⁡(φ,K)\operatorname{Preper}(\varphi, K) is finite for every φ\varphi of degree ≥2\ge 2 over every number field.

Contrast this with dynamics over R\mathbb{R} or C\mathbb{C}, where periodic points are typically dense in the Julia set (complex-dynamics): arithmetic makes finite orbits rare and finite in number. The big open problem is uniformity — Morton–Silverman conjecture: the size of Preper⁡(φ,K)\operatorname{Preper}(\varphi, K) is bounded by a constant depending only on dd, deg⁡K\deg K (not on φ\varphi). Even for z2+cz^2 + c over Q\mathbb{Q} this is open (Poonen's conjecture: at most 9 rational preperiodic points; periods 4 and 5 are proven impossible, period ≥ 6 partially).

Count along: φ(z)=z2\varphi(z) = z^2 over Q\mathbb{Q}

  • h(2)=log⁡2h(2) = \log 2, orbit 2→4→16→2562 \to 4 \to 16 \to 256: heights log⁡2,2log⁡2,4log⁡2,…\log 2, 2\log 2, 4\log 2, \dots — doubling exactly, so h^(2)=log⁡2>0\hat{h}(2) = \log 2 > 0: infinite orbit. ✓
  • Orbit of 23\tfrac{2}{3}: 23→49→1681\tfrac{2}{3} \to \tfrac{4}{9} \to \tfrac{16}{81}, heights log⁡3,log⁡9,log⁡81\log 3, \log 9, \log 81 — again doubling; h^=log⁡3\hat{h} = \log 3.
  • Preper⁡(φ,Q)={0,∞,1,−1}\operatorname{Preper}(\varphi, \mathbb{Q}) = \{0, \infty, 1, -1\} (−1→1→1-1 \to 1 \to 1): four points, exactly the height-zero rationals. Over Q‾\overline{\mathbb{Q}} the preperiodic points are 0,∞0, \infty and all roots of unity — infinitely many, but each individual field cuts out finitely many (Northcott needs bounded degree).

Why this machinery cannot see Collatz

The height argument runs on h∘φ≈d⋅hh \circ \varphi \approx d \cdot h with d≥2d \ge 2 — a multiplicative complexity growth coming from a globally defined algebraic map. The Collatz map is piecewise affine (d=1d = 1 on each branch, and the branches are glued by congruence conditions, not algebra), so canonical heights collapse and Northcott gains no purchase. That structural mismatch — not lack of effort — is why collatz-orbit-statistics runs on measure theory and probability instead.

cited by
關於這一條

sijie 的一條 wiki 條目。本站的 AI 以同一套語料庫為依據、以 sijie 的口吻作答,並附有指向此類條目的引用——回答會花 sijie 的錢,所以它在存取碼後等待: 輸入存取碼 →

arithmetic-dynamics — Sijie Wang