Topological dynamics on the interval — Sharkovskii's order
Parent: orbit · Prereq: discrete-dynamical-systems
Setting: an interval, continuous (nothing more — no smoothness, no measure). The astonishing fact: mere continuity on a one-dimensional space already forces a rigid arithmetic of periods.
Sharkovskii's ordering
Order the positive integers as follows (⊳ = "precedes"):
Odd numbers first, then odds, then odds, …, and at the very end the powers of two, descending.
Sharkovskii (1964)If a continuous has a periodic point of period , it has periodic points of every period with .
So period 3 forces all periods (3 is ⊳-maximal), and a map with only finitely many periods can only have periods that are powers of two. The ordering is sharp: for every there is a map whose set of periods is exactly .
Li–Yorke (1975), "period three implies chaos"If has a period-3 point, there is an uncountable scrambled set : for all in ,
Orbits of scrambled pairs approach each other arbitrarily closely, forever, without ever staying together.
The proof engine behind both: if intervals satisfy and (a covering relation, which a period-3 orbit provides), then every infinite itinerary through the covering graph is realized by some point — an orbit for every symbol sequence. That is symbolic-dynamics entering through the back door.
Count along: a genuine period-3 orbit
Tent map on . Take :
A 3-cycle — so by Sharkovskii the tent map has periodic orbits of every period, and by Li–Yorke it is chaotic.
The one-dimensionality is essential
On the circle, the rotation by has every orbit of period exactly 3 and no other periods at all. Sharkovskii's order is a theorem about the interval's topology (its proof lives on the intermediate value theorem), not about dynamics in general.