2026-08-28·by Sijie Wang#cybernetics#theory#stages-and-gates

stage-anatomy

What a stage contains (the injection)

Parent: stages-and-gates

A stage isn't an empty checkpoint. On entry it injects four things into the executor's free zone:

  1. goal + done-criterion — what to produce, and what counts as finished (the exit gate, stated up front).
  2. task context — the specific inputs / material for this task at this stage.
  3. standard-practice playbook — the domain's "how this stage is normally done well": a checklist / template / heuristics / good+bad examples.
  4. available tools — possibly restricted to this stage.

Then the executor runs freely within that frame, and hits the exit gate (deliverables + criteria).

The injection = per-stage incentive-shaping (7b): it biases the agent toward the standard practice without scripting the steps.

Playbook ≠ script

The injected playbook is advice the agent can adapt (就事论事), not a sequence it must execute. "Skills are advice the model can ignore; the net is a skill with teeth." — the playbook is the skill, the gate is the teeth. That's the line between shaping (#7b) and script (#1)script.

The framework (stages + gates) is generic; each stage's content is a domain plug-in — the owner's "theme" is the per-stage playbook (a skill).

Concrete (Google launch / PRR): the pre-launch stage injects a launch checklist + standard reviews (design, privacy, security, legal, and the SRE Production-Readiness-Review: capacity, monitoring, on-call, rollback, load/failure testing). The checklist is dual-purpose — guidance for the free zone and the gate criteria.

(The per-question answer pipeline — read → retrieve → compose → guard — is what runs inside a stage's free zone; the stages are the session-level arc.)

about this entry

One of sijie's wiki entries. The AI on this site is grounded in the same corpus and answers in sijie's voice, with citations back to entries like this one — answering costs sijie money, so it waits behind a code: enter an access code →