2026-08-28·von Sijie Wang#math

gauss-map

The Gauss map — continued fractions as orbits

Parent: orbit · Prereq: ergodic-theory-of-orbits

The most striking case of "an orbit is a classical object": iterating one map reads out the continued-fraction expansion, and Birkhoff turns that into digit statistics for almost every real number.

Gauss map

G:(0,1)→[0,1)G: (0,1) \to [0,1), G(x)=1x−⌊1x⌋\quad G(x) = \dfrac{1}{x} - \left\lfloor \dfrac{1}{x} \right\rfloor (the fractional part of 1/x1/x). The digits of xx are an(x)=⌊1/Gn−1(x)⌋a_n(x) = \left\lfloor 1 / G^{n-1}(x) \right\rfloor, and then

x=1a1+1a2+1a3+⋯x = \cfrac{1}{a_1 + \cfrac{1}{a_2 + \cfrac{1}{a_3 + \cdots}}}

— the orbit under GG shifts the continued fraction, exactly as the doubling map shifts binary digits.

The invariant measure (Gauss, 1812, in a letter — no proof left behind)

Lebesgue measure is not preserved. The right one:

Gauss measure

μ(A)=1log⁡2∫Adx1+x\mu(A) = \dfrac{1}{\log 2} \displaystyle\int_A \dfrac{dx}{1+x} is GG-invariant, and GG is ergodic with respect to it.

Verification of invariance on A=(0,t)A = (0, t): the preimage is G−1(0,t)=⋃k≥1(1k+t,1k]G^{-1}(0,t) = \bigcup_{k \ge 1} \left( \tfrac{1}{k+t}, \tfrac{1}{k} \right] (those xx whose 1/x1/x has integer part kk and fractional part <t< t). Summing:

∑k≥1[log⁡ ⁣(1+1k)−log⁡ ⁣(1+1k+t)]⋅1log⁡2\sum_{k\ge1} \left[ \log\!\left(1 + \tfrac{1}{k}\right) - \log\!\left(1 + \tfrac{1}{k+t}\right) \right] \cdot \tfrac{1}{\log 2}

telescopes (write log⁡(1+1k)=log⁡(k+1)−log⁡k\log(1+\tfrac1k) = \log(k+1) - \log k and log⁡(1+1k+t)=log⁡(k+1+t)−log⁡(k+t)\log(1+\tfrac{1}{k+t}) = \log(k+1+t) - \log(k+t); partial sums collapse) to log⁡(1+t)log⁡2=μ((0,t))\tfrac{\log(1+t)}{\log 2} = \mu\big((0,t)\big). ✓

What Birkhoff then buys — for almost every real number

Applying the ergodic theorem (ergodic-theory-of-orbits) to indicator and log functions of the digits:

  • Gauss–Kuzmin digit frequencies: the digit kk appears with limiting frequency μ(a1=k)=log⁡2 ⁣(1+1k(k+2)).\mu\big(a_1 = k\big) = \log_2\!\left(1 + \frac{1}{k(k+2)}\right). Count along: digit 1 → log⁡243≈41.50%\log_2 \tfrac{4}{3} \approx 41.50\%, digit 2 → log⁡298≈16.99%\log_2 \tfrac{9}{8} \approx 16.99\%, digit 3 → log⁡21615≈9.31%\log_2 \tfrac{16}{15} \approx 9.31\%. Small digits dominate, but every digit occurs with positive frequency — for almost every xx.
  • Khinchin's constant: the geometric mean of the digits converges, a1a2⋯ann→K0=∏k≥1(1+1k(k+2))log⁡2k≈2.6854\sqrt[n]{a_1 a_2 \cdots a_n} \to K_0 = \prod_{k\ge1} \left(1 + \tfrac{1}{k(k+2)}\right)^{\log_2 k} \approx 2.6854 — the same constant for almost every real.
  • Lévy's constant: the denominators qnq_n of the convergents grow at a universal exponential rate, 1nlog⁡qn→π212log⁡2≈1.1866\tfrac{1}{n}\log q_n \to \tfrac{\pi^2}{12 \log 2} \approx 1.1866.

The fine print

"Almost every" excludes precisely the interesting arithmetic points: rationals (finite expansion — orbit hits 00 and stops) and quadratic irrationals (eventually periodic digits — Lagrange's theorem; e.g. the golden ratio has an≡1a_n \equiv 1, geometric mean 1≠K01 \neq K_0). Same shape of caveat as ergodic-theory-of-orbits and, at full strength, collatz-orbit-statistics: measure-theoretic knowledge, pointwise blindness.

über diesen eintrag

Einer von sijie's Wiki-Einträgen. Die KI auf dieser Site ist im selben Corpus verankert und antwortet in sijie's Stimme mit Zitaten zurück auf Einträge wie diesen — das Beantworten kostet sijie Geld, daher wartet sie hinter einem Code: zugriffscode eingeben →